| By Ian Edwards,
on 06 Apr 2010
|
Views : 379 |
Published in : Blog, Software |
It is still not uncommon for businesses
to mismanage data, or even fail to manage it at all. Left to their own
devices your staff / colleagues will devise their own methods for
keeping track of the information that is necessary for them to do their
jobs. Techniques used might range from a card file for contacts to an
access database or excel spreadsheet containing customer or product
information. Alternatively contacts could be stored in an organiser
application such as Outlook and files possibly in shared directories on
a file server somewhere. If these file shares have been setup properly
then users will only have access to documents that concern them. If it
hasn't been setup properly there will be no control over who is
accessing or modifying what, although part of the problem here is the crude and
practically ineffective permissions management in current operating
systems - but that's another story.
Microsoft have attempted to address this problem of unstructured data with Sharepoint
which has become a commercially very successful collaboration and
document sharing and workflow platform and, through being bundled in it's basic
version as part of the Windows server operating system, has become
almost as ubiquitous as Windows itself. Sharepoint
is a platform which gives the user tools to build an application
appropriate to their needs, which means a level of skill in developing
such an application is required. You may have these skills in house or may ask a specialist IT company to do the work for you, but, and this relates to my earlier post on the mis-use
of office suites in businesses, why go to the trouble of hacking out
your own application, with all the problems that implies, when there is
specialist software out there that can do the job for you practically
out of the box? The usual answer to this question is cost. Specialist
applications, particularly in the manufacturing sector, cost serious
money and in most cases still require costly consultancy to setup and
maintain. For completeness I should mention that Microsoft do produce a manufacturing module for their Navision range of business software which is generally a mid range cost option, Sharepoint isn't intended as a manufacturing solution but has the potential to be used in this way.
Thankfully the landscape is changing largely as a result of
the onward march of open source software forcing the most proprietary
of vendors such as Microsoft to reconsider their approach. The
Microsoft response to open source is their "Enterprise Open Source"
model. Here software vendors develop to the Microsoft platform
(Windows) but provide the software free of licencing costs, the vendor
making their money on upgrades and support.
One such application is PLM (Product Lifecycle Management) software from Arras. This is free to download and use and with some basic configuration offers fully featured product lifecycle
management for the manufacturing sector, although application in other
sectors is possible. It is not my intention to offer a full review of Aras
here, maybe save that for another post, but the software is browser
based (users access it from a web browser with all the advantages that
brings, although I gather this has to be IE unfortunately ) and allows a manufacturer to maintain full control of the
documents, drawing (including CAD files and viewers) BOM (Bill of
Materials), workflow and other items involved in product development and manufacture. And don't think that because this is free it's a toy, Aras
is used by major corporations including Motorola, Xerox and Rolls Royce
(Rolls Royce marine in the US), but it is scalable to the requirements
of an SME.
So what are the benefits of PLM? A case study that will be used for a very long time is
that of the recent problems to hit Toyota. Whilst it may be argued that
Toyota were a bit slow in owning up to the problem - once it had been
identified they were able to contact every affected customer and
arrange repair. They identified the batch of components that caused the problem, which vehicles the defective parts had been installed in and were then able to trace the current owners of those vehicles. This was only possible because they had full control of their product data throughout it's lifecycle.
You can find out more about Aras here. If you are in manufacturing and would like to discuss the application of PLM to your business please contact me.
|
|
|
shapespace integration
By: Yoann Maingon on 12 Jun 2010
And also AESSIS another Aras partner worked on a Shapespace3D(http:// www.shapespace.com/) integration to help reduce part duplicates. (here is their article about the integration => http://www.aessis.com/ MediaCentre/download.aspx? id=28)
» Reply to this comment...